I’m somewhat updating and reposting this from 2012 since the main-stream media have actually guaranteed really people that are few the information for the “case” against Julian Assange in Sweden. The UN performing Group ruled that Assange ought to never have now been arrested in britain in the beginning while there is no instance, with no investigation that is genuine. Check this out and you also will understand why.
One other thing perhaps perhaps not commonly recognized will there be is not any JURY in a rape test in Sweden which is a SECRET TEST. Most of the proof, all the witnesses, are heard in key. No public, no jury, no news. The actual only real part that is public the charging and also the verdict. There is certainly a judge and two advisers straight appointed by governmental events. Which means you never ever would get to comprehend just just exactly how clearly the instance is really a stitch-up. Unless you check this out.
You will find so inconsistencies that are many Anna Ardin’s accusation of intimate attack against Julian Assange. Nevertheless the key question which leaps down I have not seen asked anywhere else – is this at me– and which strangely:
Why did Anna Ardin maybe maybe not alert Sofia Wilen?
On 16 August, Julian Assange had intercourse with Sofia Wilen. Sofia had become understood within the Swedish team around Assange when it comes to shocking red cashmere sweater she had used within the front row of Assange’s press seminar. Anna Ardin knew Assange ended up being intending to have sexual intercourse with Sofia Wilen. On 17 August, Ardin texted a pal who was simply trying to find Assange:
“He’s maybe not right right right here. He’s planned to own sex with all the cashmere woman every night, not managed to get. Perhaps he finally discovered time yesterday? ”
Yet Ardin later testified that simply three days earlier in the day, on 13 August, she have been sexually assaulted by Assange; an assault therefore serious she ended up being happy to decide to try (with great success) to ruin Julian Assange’s entire life. She has also been to mention that this attack included enforced sex that is unprotected she had been worried about HIV.
If Ardin really believed that on 13 August Assange had forced non-safe sex on her behalf and also this might have sent HIV, why did she make no try to alert Sofia Wilen that Wilen was at threat of her life? And exactly why had been Ardin talking about with Assange his desire for intercourse with Wilen, and texting about any of it to buddies, without any disapproval that is evident discouragement?
Ardin had Wilen’s contact information as well as had organised her enrollment for the press meeting. She may have warned her. But she didn’t.
Let’s fit that into a tremendously brief survey regarding the entire relationship that is ardin/Assange.
11 August: Assange comes in Stockholm for the press meeting organised with a branch regarding the Social Democratic Party. Anna Ardin has provided her one sleep flat for him in which to stay as she’s going to be away.
13 August: Ardin comes home early. She’s dinner with Assange and additionally they have actually consensual intercourse, from the very first day’s meeting. Ardin afterwards alleges this changed into attack by surreptitious mutilation associated with the condom.
14 August: Anna volunteers to behave as Julian’s press assistant. She sits close to him regarding the dais at their press meeting. Assange fulfills Sofia Wilen here.
‘Julian desires to head to a party that is crayfish anybody have a few available seats tonight or tomorrow? #fb’
This make an effort to look for a crayfish celebration fails, so Ardin organises one herself for him, in a yard outside her flat. Anna and Julian appear good together. One visitor hears Anna rib Assange that she thought “you had dumped me” as he got up from sleep early that early early morning. Another provides to Anna that Julian can keep her flat and come stick to them. She replies: “He can stick to me personally. ”
15 August Nevertheless at the crayfish party with Julian, Anna tweets:
‘Sitting in the open air at 02:00 and scarcely freezing utilizing the world’s coolest smartest people, it is amazing! #fb’
Julian and Anna, in accordance with both their authorities testimonies, sleep once again in identical bed that is single and continue doing therefore for the following day or two. Assange tells police they continue steadily to have intercourse; Anna tells police they don’t. That night, Anna and Julian get together to, and then leave together from, a supper aided by the leadership associated with Pirate Party. They again sleep when you look at the bed that is same.
16 August: Julian would go to have sexual intercourse with Sofia Wilen: Ardin will not alert her of prospective intimate attack. Another buddy provides Anna to take control housing Julian. Anna once more declines.
20 August: After Sofia Wilen contacts her to say she actually is concerned about STD’s including HIV after unprotected sex with Julian, Anna takes her to see Anna’s buddy, other personal Democrat user, previous colleague for a passing fancy ballot in a council election, and campaigning feminist police, Irmeli Krans. Ardin informs Wilen the police can compel Assange to just simply take an HIV test. Ardin sits in throughout Wilen’s unrecorded – in breach of procedure – police meeting. Krans makes a declaration accusing Assange of rape. Wilen does not want to signal it.
21 August Having heard Wilen’s meeting and Krans’ statement from this, Ardin makes her very own authorities statement alleging Assange has surreptiously had sex that is unprotected her eight days formerly.
Some days later on: Ardin creates a broken condom to your authorities as proof; but a forensic assessment discovers no traces of Assange’s – or anyone else’s – DNA upon it, as well as its apparently unused.
No witness has arrived ahead to say that Ardin complained Check Out Your URL of intimate attack by Assange before Wilen’s Ardin-arranged meeting with Krans – and Wilen arrived ahead to not whine of an assault, but check into STDs. Wilen declined to signal the declaration alleging rape, that was used by Ardin’s friend Krans in Ardin’s existence.
It is plain this 1 of a couple of things occurred:
Either
Ardin ended up being intimately assaulted with unsafe sex, but did not warn Wilen whenever she knew Assange would definitely see her in hope of intercourse.
Ardin also proceeded to host Assange, assist him, come in general general public and personal with him, work as his press assistant, and rest in the same sleep with him, refusing duplicated provides to support him elsewhere, all after he assaulted her.
Or
Ardin desired sex with Assange – from whatever motive. She “unexpectedly” came back home early after providing him making use of her one sleep flat while she ended up being away. By her very own admission, she had consensual intercourse with him, within hours of fulfilling him.
She talked about with Assange his desire for intercourse with Wilen, and appears at the least to not have been discouraging. Hearing of Wilen’s concern about HIV after unsafe sex, she took Wilen to her campaigning feminist buddy, policewoman Irmeli Krans, so that you can twist Wilen’s tale right into a sexual assault – quite easy provided Sweden’s astonishing “second-wave feminism” rape rules. Wilen declined to signal.
During the authorities place on 20 August, Wilen texted a pal at 14.25 “did not need to place any fees against JA nevertheless the authorities desired to get a handle on him. ”
At 17.26 she texted because I only wanted him to take a test” that she was “shocked when they arrested JA.
The next night at 22.22 she texted “it ended up being the authorities whom fabricated the charges”.
Ardin then comprised her own story of intimate attack. As a lot of buddies knew she had been making love with Assange, she could perhaps perhaps not claim sex that is non-consensual. Therefore she manufactured her story to fit right in with Wilen’s issues by alleging the affair for the torn condom. Nevertheless the torn condom she produced doesn’t have trace of Assange upon it. It really is impractical to wear a condom rather than keep a DNA trace.
Summary
No difficulty is had by me in stating that We securely think Ardin to be always a liar. On her tale to be real involves acceptance of behavior that will be, into the sense that is literal amazing.
Ardin’s tale is needless to say extremely poor, but that doesn’t matter. Firstly, you had been never ever supposed to see all this work detail. Rape studies in Sweden are held completely in key. There’s absolutely no jury, as well as the national federal government appointed judge is flanked by assessors appointed straight by governmental events. The trial will be secret, and the next thing you will hear is that he is guilty and a rapist if Assange goes to Sweden, he will disappear into jail.
Secondly, needless to say, it doesn’t matter evidence can be so poor, as simply to cry rape would be to tarnish a reputation that is man’s. Anna Ardin has recently succeeded in destroying a lot of the ongoing work and life of Assange. The information associated with the tale being pathetic is unimportant.
By crying rape, politically proper viewpoint falls in behind the line that it’s incorrect also to check out the data. If you’re perhaps not permitted to understand whom the accuser is, how could you discover that she worked with CIA-funded anti-Castro teams in Havana and Miami?
Finally, to those of good use idiots whom declare that how you can test these issues is with in court, i’d state needless to say, you may be appropriate, we ought to trust their state constantly, fit-ups never happen, and we also should positively condemn the disgraceful behavior of the whom campaigned for the Birmingham Six.
